Taking out the garbage

Turn with me now, if you will, to the books of 1st and 2nd Contradictions, otherwise known as the epistle to the Hebrews. This Greek letter was penned by Paul or by one of his students. We don’t know for sure because the letter is anonymous. Whoever wrote it didn’t want to put their name on it. The author wrote it from Italy and he or she mentions Timothy (Hebrews 13:23-24). So this author was definitely someone very high up within Paul’s circle, and probably not Paul himself. Paul is never too shy to put his name on a letter he wrote. Anyway, I digress.

This letter asks a whole lot from the reader, among them being that the reader should believe that the law given thru Mashah (Moses) and the covenant are faulty (Hebrews 8:7). The author considers this obvious from the fact that a new covenant is announced in Yaram-Ya’oh (Jeremiah) 31:31-34. He or she reasoned, why would a new covenant be needed if the first one was not faultless? It never dawned on this author that the new covenant does not do away with and replace the first covenant it simply “renews” it upon the heart. Of course that never crossed his or her mind because the agenda was to push Paul’s satanic doctrine that Christ abolished the law in terms of how righteousness is to be obtained by the individual. According to Paul, righteousness comes from having faith in Christ’s death to atone for your sins, and not from keeping the commandments of the law.

Now, you’d think that the anonymous author of 1st and 2nd Contradictions who made these bold claims, and who misused the so-called Old Testament to back them up, would be an expert at all the information contained in the Old Testament. That is not the case. In fact, this author was utterly ignorant. Let me give you just one of several examples so you can see what I mean.

The author of 1st and 2nd Contradictions says that the most holy place of the tabernacle contained the Ark of the Covenant AND the golden altar of incense (Hebrews 9:3-4). Now the Caucasian scholars who made the Queen James Version in 1611 translated the Greek word θυμιατήριον in Hebrews 9:4 as “golden censer,” but in the first century this Greek word described the altar of incense itself. You can look this up and verify it all by yourself by reading Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 5.5.5. There you will find that Josephus uses this very word as the ordinary appellation of the altar of incense.

Question: Was the golden altar of incense or the censer put behind the veil to be with the Ark of the Covenant?

Answer: Nope. The altar of incense was in the holy place of the tabernacle, not the most holy place behind the veil. It was placed before the veil and not behind it like the Ark was (Exodus 30:6).

So why are you still reading and trusting anything that 1st and 2nd Contradictions (aka the Greek epistle to the Hebrews) has to say when its author was ignorant and illiterate of basic things like where holy items were placed inside the tabernacle?

Don’t tell me this is just a minor problematic detail and it does not invalidate the entire book. Oh yes it does. It’s not the only amateur blunder this author makes either. It’s just the only one I’m talking about now. Anyone telling you to look at the covenant as something “faulty” is of the devil. Period.

This letter was penned by a heathen who had no intimate knowledge of the temple. What he or she knew came from the Greek translation of Thorah and he or she didn’t even understand that correctly. Throw this letter in the trash where it belongs. The entire Greek New Testament is garbage designed to lead you away from keeping the covenant and away from the one true savior who mandated it.

His name is YA’OH
Always has been. Always will be.

#EXODUS2023